16.2.5 Language Spoken

Table 16: Language Spoken Scoring

Characteristics
Score

English, Spanish, Other Language

+1

Detailed Language with Population 300,001 - 4,000,000

e.g., Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, Korean

+2

Detailed Language with Population 100,001 - 300,000

e.g., Persian, Hindi, Arabic, Russian, Japanese, French

+3

Detailed Language with Population 20,001 - 100,000

e.g., German, Portuguese, Hmong, Hebrew, Bengali, Polish

+5

Detailed Language with Population ≤20,000

e.g., Haitian, Navajo

+7

Language spoken is captured in a variety of data systems to support individuals in receiving services in the language they speak. Language Spoken is not collected as part of the decennial Census, so the following estimates of language spoken at home are used to assess the population sizes of various languages. These estimates of language spoken are taken from the 2017-2021 5-year American Community Survey (ACS). These Statewide population estimates of language spoken along with Table 2 are used to determine the groupings for the scoring above.

Table 17: California Population Estimates by Language Spoken

Language Spoken at Home for the Population 5 years and older
California Estimate
Margin of Error

Total

37,105,018

±669

Speak only English

20,833,290

±49,117

Spanish

10,514,821

±34,689

Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese)

1,259,668

±13,770

Tagalog (incl. Filipino)

780,024

±10,075

Vietnamese

556,398

±8,380

Korean

358,018

±7,365

Persian (incl. Farsi, Dari)

211,089

±6,309

Hindi

203,238

±6,535

Arabic

198,914

±7,807

Armenian

195,413

±5,581

Russian

170,508

±4,817

Punjabi

142,450

±6,035

Japanese

136,009

±4,890

French (incl. Cajun)

126,338

±4,041

Ilocano, Samoan, Hawaiian, or other Austronesian languages (aggregated group)

120,223

±4,014

German

93,471

±2,737

Portuguese

91,042

±3,852

Thai, Lao, or other Tai-Kadai languages (aggregated group)

75,646

±3,518

Other Indo-European languages (aggregated group)

75,233

±3,511

Hmong

74,317

±3,670

Telugu

67,956

±3,101

Khmer

67,756

±3,552

Other languages of Asia (aggregated group)

65,969

±3,512

Amharic, Somali, or other Afro-Asiatic languages (aggregated group)

63,318

±3,433

Tamil

60,594

±2,885

Nepali, Marathi, or other Indic languages (aggregated group)

58,552

±2,832

Urdu

54,569

±2,938

Italian

53,954

±2,128

Gujarati

51,662

±2,772

Hebrew

44,540

±2,542

Ukrainian or other Slavic languages (aggregated group)

41,606

±2,630

Malayalam, Kannada, or other Dravidian languages (aggregated group)

37,709

±2,672

Yoruba, Twi, Igbo, or other languages of Western Africa (aggregated group)

34,305

±2,830

Bengali

30,223

±2,043

Yiddish, Pennsylvania Dutch or other West Germanic languages (aggregated group)

26,359

±1,870

Polish

21,304

±1,639

Serbo-Croatian

20,022

±1,470

Greek

19,783

±1,576

Swahili or other languages of Central, Eastern, and Southern Africa (aggregated group)

16,547

±1,558

Haitian

7,878

±1,071

Other Native languages of North America (aggregated group)

5,841

±713

Navajo

1,043

±305

Other and unspecified languages

37,418

±2,389

Based on the above numbers, the majority of individuals speak English or Spanish. Therefore, if the table includes “English”, “Spanish”, and “Other Language” as the categories for “Language Spoken”, then the score is +1 which is comparable to reporting Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity as a “Yes or No”.

As noted for Race and Ethnicity demographics, language spoken demographics may vary significantly based on geography as well as based on particular conditions. So although the scoring criteria presents a guideline for assessing risk, the population frequencies for the specific geography and/or condition should also be taken into account.

If more specificity for Language Spoken is being requested with respect to reporting on the other languages in the table above, the request will need to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The additional review is necessary given the variability of language spoken by different populations or geographies and the consideration for potential increased risk of identification.

Last updated

Was this helpful?